pulling the feels…
pulling the feels…
FLICKFEEL
50
from 43 comments
COMMUNITY
—
nobody yet
YOURS
—
…
FUN
0
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
56
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score — the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 43 comments (40 from Metacritic, 3 from TMDB reviews) — 14 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence — the shape below rests on 14 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
“This film is essentially 2 hours of exposition while the characters act like things are happening. But what’s actually happening is an absolute mess on screen with a bunch of characters that are so bland you could eat them after vomiting from how disgustingly bad this movie is.”
joshybean · Metacritic ↗
“overall its just boring”
joshybean · Metacritic ↗
“It's quick and suspenseful”
ShadowU · Metacritic ↗
“The ending in particularly stood out as incredibly stupid, it made no sense at all.”
ShadowU · Metacritic ↗
“the pace was slow to start with”
DawdlingPoet · Metacritic ↗
“it certainly sped up after a while”
DawdlingPoet · Metacritic ↗
Read 25 Aug 2026 · confidence 100% · scored on the same 0-100 scale as a community score · how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience — a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
“This kind of film requires us to be very forgiving, and if we are, it promises to entertain. Angels & Demons succeeds.”
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times · 75
“Plucking the same violent, occult strings as "Da Vinci" while avoiding its leadenness, Angels keeps the action coming for the best part of 139 minutes.”
Deborah Young, The Hollywood Reporter · 70
“The movie includes some tony philosophizing about the conflict between science and faith, but it's mostly a beat-the-clock chase through Rome (nicely evoked in Salvatore Totino's lush cinematography).”
Andrea Gronvall, Chicago Reader · 70
“As transparent as this device is, Angels has elemental satisfactions in its blend of movie genre that could appeal to wide segments of the audience.”
Richard Corliss, Time · 70
“The new movie is an opulent-bordering-on-hysterical mass of chitchat and chase scenes.”
Lisa Schwarzbaum, Entertainment Weekly · 67
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 25 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
“This film is essentially 2 hours of exposition while the characters act like things are happening. But what’s actually happening is an absolute mess on screen with a bunch of characters that are so bland you could eat them after vomiting from how disgustingly bad this movie is.”
joshybeanabout 0–100% inread it ↗
“overall its just boring”
joshybeanabout 0–100% inread it ↗
“It's quick and suspenseful”
ShadowUabout 0–100% inread it ↗
“The ending in particularly stood out as incredibly stupid, it made no sense at all.”
ShadowUabout 75–100% inread it ↗
“Angels & Demons delivers a gripping follow-up to The Da Vinci Code, blending science, religion, and mystery with improved pacing and visual execution. Though fictional and controversial, the film presents its themes with cinematic flair, strong performances, and a more engaging narrative. A thrilling watch, as long as viewers remain critical of its historical liberties. Read the full review here: (Indonesian version : alunauwie.com) and (English version : uwiepuspita.com)”
Alunauwieread it ↗
no tags yet — rate this flick to drop some vibes ✨