pulling the feelsβ¦
pulling the feelsβ¦
FLICKFEEL
β
from 28 comments
COMMUNITY
β
nobody yet
YOURS
β
β¦
FUN
50
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
0
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score β the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 28 comments (25 from Metacritic, 3 from TMDB reviews) β 4 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence β the shape below rests on 4 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
βThe entire final act is a bore that lasts for 30+ minutes when it could have been 20 at best. It just instantly kills all excitement that the movie while playing out in a predictable fashion.β
imthenoob Β· Metacritic β
βThe plot starts of strongβ
Tbrown5 Β· Metacritic β
βit loses track at the endβ
Tbrown5 Β· Metacritic β
βstarting was good the family names at stake with little family issues it was fun to watchβ
Diptanshu Β· Metacritic β
βthe ending was a little boringβ
TheApplegnome Β· Metacritic β
Read 25 Aug 2026 Β· confidence 20% Β· too thin for a score Β· how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience β a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
βA welcome throwback to family-friendly PG moviemaking.β
Peter Hartlaub, San Francisco Chronicle Β· 75
βThis ainβt "The Da Vinci Code," folks, and the reason you can tell is that itβs actually quite entertaining.β
Luke Y. Thompson, L.A. Weekly Β· 70
βCage is back in crackling good form in National Treasure: Book of Secrets.β
Ann Hornaday, Washington Post Β· 70
βIt's a measure of the film's infectious goofiness that Cage seems altogether more interested in clearing the name of a long-dead ancestor than in finding a city of gold.β
Nathan Rabin, The A.V. Club Β· 67
βDirector Jon Turteltaub has fun with Indian glyphs, giant stone pulleys, and an Indy Jones-worthy City of Gold located beneath the rocky shoals of Mount Rushmore.β
Owen Gleiberman, Entertainment Weekly Β· 67
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 25 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
βThe entire final act is a bore that lasts for 30+ minutes when it could have been 20 at best. It just instantly kills all excitement that the movie while playing out in a predictable fashion.β
imthenoobabout 75β100% inread it β
βThe plot starts of strongβ
Tbrown5about 0β15% inread it β
βit loses track at the endβ
Tbrown5about 75β100% inread it β
βstarting was good the family names at stake with little family issues it was fun to watchβ
Diptanshuabout 0β15% inread it β
βJoyous boys own yarn full of the serial silliness of movies past, present and the first movie! As with the enormously successful first film, this sequel irritated as many people as it entertained. It's just the nature of the family friendly blockbuster, that some film fans refuse to accept them as viable fun family fare, whilst others can easily run with it and have a great time. The highbrow versus the lowbrow? Well maybe if you want to really be speaky arty about it... National Treasureβ
John Chardread it β
βWell, what do you know, a sequel that's pretty much the same story as the original. But so what? This movie isn't as good as the first but it's just as enjoyable. So let's get on board and find some treasure. Just one thing, can someone explain to me why Nicolas Cage got so loud in this one?β
Robread it β
no tags yet β rate this flick to drop some vibes β¨