pulling the feels…
pulling the feels…
FLICKFEEL
54
from 51 comments
COMMUNITY
—
nobody yet
YOURS
—
…
FUN
35
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
40
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score — the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 51 comments (46 from Metacritic, 5 from TMDB reviews) — 15 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence — the shape below rests on 15 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
“it gets boring entering the final third”
John Chard · TMDB reviews ↗
“a decent build up from the start”
Dark Jedi · TMDB reviews ↗
“i liked the tension at the end”
badshaped · Metacritic ↗
“the tsunami scene is excellent”
eva3si0n · Metacritic ↗
“its just about a constant visual disaster that goes 'all guns blazing', once it starts, with so much in the way of explosions, crumbling and toppling buildings and other such things that I felt myself thinking there's no way this could surely be anywhere near real. Now whether that is the case or not, I can't really say but I was very aware that I felt desensitised from what was going on visually”
DawdlingPoet · Metacritic ↗
“se me hace un poco exagerado el primer terremoto de la película porque se supone que Los Angeles es una ciudad propensa a los terremotos y por ende sus estructura debe ser resistente y en la película el primero terremoto ya genera derrumbes de proporciones catastróficas y en la vida real si habrían daños pero no de esa magnitud al menos no en una ciudad como esa”
Eliassalass · Metacritic ↗
Read 26 Aug 2026 · confidence 100% · scored on the same 0-100 scale as a community score · how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience — a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
“There are really no surprises here. But the action is bracing, Johnson’s performance is solid and, within its extremely narrow parameters, entirely convincing, and Gugino and Daddario are both gritty and attractive. The result is a pretty exemplary popcorn movie.”
Glenn Kenny, RogerEbert.com · 75
“Starting with a mountainside rescue setting up Ray's bravery, through cities ruined and a tsunami leveling San Francisco, San Andreas is gnaw-your-knuckle fun. Which is the roller coaster conflict that comes with the disaster movie genre, the closeness to horrific reality that attracts millions yet repels a sensitive few.”
Steve Persall, Tampa Bay Times · 75
“By turns frightening, exciting and ridiculous, San Andreas is, in the end, more impressive than anything else.”
Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle · 75
“The CGI effects in this film, directed by Brad Peyton, are quite remarkable and help take one’s mind off the cornball disaster-brings-families-together underpinnings.”
Peter Rainer, Christian Science Monitor · 75
“Quite literally the blockbuster of the year.”
Steven Rea, Philadelphia Inquirer · 75
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 24 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
“i liked the tension at the end”
badshapedabout 75–100% inread it ↗
“the tsunami scene is excellent”
eva3si0nabout 75–100% inread it ↗
“its just about a constant visual disaster that goes 'all guns blazing', once it starts, with so much in the way of explosions, crumbling and toppling buildings and other such things that I felt myself thinking there's no way this could surely be anywhere near real. Now whether that is the case or not, I can't really say but I was very aware that I felt desensitised from what was going on visually”
DawdlingPoetabout 0–100% inread it ↗
“se me hace un poco exagerado el primer terremoto de la película porque se supone que Los Angeles es una ciudad propensa a los terremotos y por ende sus estructura debe ser resistente y en la película el primero terremoto ya genera derrumbes de proporciones catastróficas y en la vida real si habrían daños pero no de esa magnitud al menos no en una ciudad como esa”
Eliassalassabout 0–15% inread it ↗
“it gets boring entering the final third”
John Chardabout 66–100% inread it ↗
“a decent build up from the start”
Dark Jediabout 0–15% inread it ↗
“> Film San Andreas nice but to be honest I do not like the plot, why? because in the story of this movie seem monotonous and selfish. Many victims around but why Ray and Emma only focused to rescue his daughter (Blake) alone, but Ray is living as rescuers, the film tends to be lacking in the delivery of its humanitarian message.”
liamelanitaread it ↗
“I have never been a fan of the Disaster genre, I don't seem to be able to take much more away from it than visual noise. I was hoping that the combined might of Alexandra Daddario and The Rock would be enough to turn me around on _San Andreas_, alas, it was not to be. _Final rating:★★ - Had some things that appeal to me, but a poor finished product._”
Gimlyread it ↗
no tags yet — rate this flick to drop some vibes ✨