pulling the feelsβ¦
pulling the feelsβ¦
FLICKFEEL
β
from 18 comments
COMMUNITY
β
nobody yet
YOURS
β
β¦
FUN
0
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
0
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score β the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 18 comments (12 from Metacritic, 6 from TMDB reviews) β 2 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence β the shape below rests on 2 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
βThe "Problem" with the Movie was the whole dramatic Part of it . I personally think this was totally unnecessary. There was no need for the plot with the Killerβ
Meik Β· Metacritic β
βDespite a weak beginningβ
EssenceOfSugar Β· Metacritic β
βWhat I didn't get about this film was that it was sometimes confusing and kept changing directionβ
EssenceOfSugar Β· Metacritic β
Read 28 Aug 2026 Β· confidence 4% Β· too thin for a score Β· how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience β a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
βTwins is not a great comedy - it's not up there with Reitman's "Ghostbusters" and DeVito is not as funny as he was in "Ruthless People" and "Wise Guys" - but it is an engaging entertainment with some big laughs and a sort of warm goofiness.β
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times Β· 75
βTwins starts with an overblown fairy-tale quality that seems as if it should work. But, by the finish, the movie collapses on the shoulders of the stars. It works because they both showed up and delivered the goods and kept their end of the deal. [9 Dec 1988, p.1]β
Michael Wilmington, Los Angeles Times Β· 70
βThe whole movie has a warmth about it that never slops over into sentiment: there is much more here than tall-guy, short-guy jokes. [12 Dec 1988, p.82]β
Richard Corliss, Time Β· 70
βThe attempts to supply heart are never more than synthetic, but Schwarzenegger, as the good guy with the good genes, and his goofy sweetness lift Twins into the win column. [9 Dec 1988, p.33]β
Jay Carr, Boston Globe Β· 63
βFor a big, floppy, silly movie that is in many ways the epitome of throwaway entertainment, Twins has its charms. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Danny DeVito make it seem they had so much fun making this flabby comedy that the fun becomes infectious.β
Peter Stack, San Francisco Chronicle Β· 63
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 28 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
βThe "Problem" with the Movie was the whole dramatic Part of it . I personally think this was totally unnecessary. There was no need for the plot with the Killerβ
Meikabout 0β100% inread it β
βDespite a weak beginningβ
EssenceOfSugarabout 0β15% inread it β
βWhat I didn't get about this film was that it was sometimes confusing and kept changing directionβ
EssenceOfSugarabout 0β100% inread it β
βA lame early 90's comedy movie as we love them. A dumb scenario paved with holes and inconsistencies that the films uses to showcase weird and funny events. This plot is so confusing that it becomes original, since it manages to find an identity for it. In my opinion it surprises in surpassing the pathetic joke of the big strong and the small petty. I couldn't stand DeVito, his character's evolution and acting. Schwarzenegger was also surprisingly funny, and the few meta-jokes he does makes it β
clem666read it β
βSo much fun to be had here. As long as you know what to expect, and really that shouldn't be too hard to do when you are getting ready to watch a movie that has Danny DeVito & Arnold Schwarzenegger as twin brothers! Julius (Arnold) & Vincent (Danny) are the result of a genetic experiment that should have realised the perfect child, instead they were born as twins, separated at birth and both went on to lead different lives. Julius was raised on a gorgeous island, he is greatly educated andβ
John Chardread it β
βGood watch, could watch again, and can recommend, if you're okay with a date movie. This movie holds up surprisingly well. It is dated quite a bit, just the dollar amounts they mention are off, and car phones and pay phones. I give full credit to the delivery of Arnold Schwarzenegger and Danny DeVito that keeps this movie enjoyable after all this time. The premise is almost laughable in 1988, but since then we've come so far as it actually being possible that this moves from science fictβ
Kamurairead it β
βFun and all around enjoyable comedy that doesn't devolve into cheap humor (i.e. constant jokes about their height for instance) and instead two opposites working well off of one another. Schwarzenegger is great as sweet innocent and naΓ―ve while Devito as a schemer and crook still was likeable. **3.75/5** I think I had seen this sometime back in the 90s but didn't remember much of it.β
JPV852read it β
β<em>'Twins'</em> is terrific! It is another one 'of those films' that I've heard about for as long as time (though post-watch it doesn't seem as (relative) well known as I thought it was!) but clearly never got around to watching it. Well I have now and I'm certainly glad I did, it's a great watch. Danny DeVito and Arnold Schwarzenegger are a fantastic duo. DeVito is always good, one of my favourites to see onscreen. Schwarzenegger impresses, I've obviously seen a decent amount of his workβ
no tags yet β rate this flick to drop some vibes β¨
r96skread it β