pulling the feels…
pulling the feels…
FUN
0
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
22
how much it moved you
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 41 comments (37 from Metacritic, 4 from TMDB reviews) — 7 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence — the shape below rests on 7 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
💀 flatline — One note, start to finish. Hard going most of the way through.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
“the action scenes are just a little bit too repetitive and dull after a whi”
CinemaSerf · TMDB reviews ↗
“i'm not sure in the beginning of the film because i did not a big fan of the whole flashback scene on how Matt became blind and all that stuff”
Habibiehakim · Metacritic ↗
“just hated this right as i made it to the first hour”
Gloom-shroom · Metacritic ↗
“I found the love story soppy and couldn't always make sense of the story”
kyle20ellis · Metacritic ↗
“I still did find the love story soppy and becoming dangerously close to flagging down the film”
kyle20ellis · Metacritic ↗
“it starts to get quite boring throughout the movie”
Robwinz · Metacritic ↗
Read 25 Aug 2026 · confidence 58% · scored on the same 0-100 scale as a community score · how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience — a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
“In short, the actors deserve a big round of applause -– especially Affleck, for finally wiping the smug look off of his face (OK, 80% smug-free); Garner, for her dead sexy mix of attitude and adrenaline; and the grunting, googly-eyed Farrell, for … well, for being "fookin’" nuts, I guess.”
Kimberley Jones, Austin Chronicle · 78
“The movie is, in short, your money's worth, better than we expect, more fun than we deserve.”
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times · 75
“Not woeful, not wonderful, merely watchable.”
Rick Groen, The Globe and Mail (Toronto) · 63
“Brought to the screen with a mix of jaunty humor and jagged violence that should have worked more effectively than it does.”
Steven Rea, Philadelphia Inquirer · 63
“It's an adequate superhero yarn, but, hopefully, it's not the best of the burgeoning genre that 2003 has to offer.”
James Berardinelli, ReelViews · 63
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 25 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
“i'm not sure in the beginning of the film because i did not a big fan of the whole flashback scene on how Matt became blind and all that stuff”
Habibiehakimabout 0–15% inread it ↗
“just hated this right as i made it to the first hour”
Gloom-shroomabout 0–33% inread it ↗
“I found the love story soppy and couldn't always make sense of the story”
kyle20ellisabout 0–100% inread it ↗
“I still did find the love story soppy and becoming dangerously close to flagging down the film”
kyle20ellisabout 0–100% inread it ↗
“the action scenes are just a little bit too repetitive and dull after a whi”
CinemaSerfabout 66–100% inread it ↗
“It's not just that Daredevil is a poorly made movie. It's that it takes a great character and turns him into a mishmash of tired clichés, shamelessly copying The Crow, Spider-Man, The Matrix, as well as both Burton and Schumacher's Batman in an attempt to appeal to the teen angst crowd. Don't blame Ben Affleck. He does what he can but the script and terrible production design lets him down as much as it us.”
tmdb44006625read it ↗
“**Daredevil is cheesy but trying to be serious while dripping in 2000s grunge. It isn’t a masterpiece, but it was a solid superhero film for its time.** Daredevil (2003) falls prey to a lot of judgment from people who have spent over a decade with Marvel films and The Dark Knight trilogy, but rewind to a time when Blade, X-Men, and Tobey Macguire’s Spider-man were all you had for superhero films, and you might start to see Daredevil for what it was. It was a genuine product of its time - Seet”
The Movie Mobread it ↗
“While the style and direction are very early 2000s in the superhero genre, I still found this relatively entertaining though seeing this again after many years, don't think Affleck was great in the role, though I did like Jennifer Garner's Elektra. As a side note, I did watch the director's cut. **3.25/5**”
no tags yet — rate this flick to drop some vibes ✨
JPV852read it ↗