pulling the feels…
pulling the feels…
FLICKFEEL
71
from 31 comments
COMMUNITY
—
nobody yet
YOURS
—
…
FUN
50
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
51
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score — the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 31 comments (29 from Metacritic, 2 from TMDB reviews) — 11 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence — the shape below rests on 11 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
“kept me involved until last frame”
badshaped · Metacritic ↗
“the plot quickly loses logic and coherency after a good setup”
Tyranian · Metacritic ↗
“there was never a dull moment!”
mtcallear · Metacritic ↗
“the finale gets dragged out”
HotelCentral · Metacritic ↗
“the film is entertaining from beginning to end”
johnslegers · Metacritic ↗
“Towards the end is spectacular”
SiAScORCH · Metacritic ↗
Read 25 Aug 2026 · confidence 71% · scored on the same 0-100 scale as a community score · how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience — a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
It plays better than it reviews — the watch lands harder than the write-ups suggest.
“Shooter is a generically titled studio action picture that turns out to be a surprisingly deft satire about Americans' loss of faith in their government following the 2000 election, the 9/11 attacks, and the ensuing wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.”
Scott Foundas, Village Voice · 80
“Shooter does what any good thriller should accomplish - it thrills. It's fast-paced, energetic, and doesn't follow a path that seems pre-ordained from the beginning.”
James Berardinelli, ReelViews · 75
“Wahlberg acquits himself well, and the supporting cast -- which includes pioneering rocker Levon Helm in a scene-stealing cameo as an aging gun buff who knows a thing or two about cover-ups, Ned Beatty as a corrupt politician, and a Strangelovian Rade Serbedzija -- is so strong you almost wish the film were longer so they could have more screen time.”
Maitland McDonagh, TV Guide Magazine · 75
“The movie's politics may miss their mark, but its thrills are dead-on.”
Peter Debruge, Miami Herald · 75
“Unravels a bit heading toward its finale, as buildings explode and characters are forced to explain themselves and their nefarious motives. But the payoff at the end - at once kind of radical and gratuitous - delivers a wallop.”
Steven Rea, Philadelphia Inquirer · 75
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 25 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
it plays better than it reviews — critics 50, the watch 71
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
“All around solid action-thriller with Mark Wahlberg in his element. Luis Guzman served as a fun sidekick and Kate Mara is a stunner. Shame this didn't do better at the box office, would've liked to have a sequel instead of that USA Network TV show... **3.75/5**”
JPV852read it ↗
“Excellent movie with major stars like Mark Wahlberg and Danny Glover. An expert marksman living in exile, is coaxed back into action after learning of a plot to kill the president. Now on the run after being double crossed by a shadow government operation. Have watched multiple times!”
RickNread it ↗
no tags yet — rate this flick to drop some vibes ✨