pulling the feels…
pulling the feels…
FLICKFEEL
51
from 257 comments
COMMUNITY
—
nobody yet
YOURS
—
…
FUN
19
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
47
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score — the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 257 comments (212 from Reddit, 40 from Metacritic, 5 from TMDB reviews) — 42 of them described how it moves.
〰️ uneven — Peaks and dips, no clear shape. Pulled both ways throughout — never simply one thing. Marked above the line: 2 that got a real laugh.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
“The first fifteen minutes or so are pretty rough in terms of editing”
Smokinacesfan55 · Reddit ↗
“it definitely gets better”
Smokinacesfan55 · Reddit ↗
“The way the film was edited made me feel nauseous from beginning to end”
Dutchy___ · Reddit ↗
“in the third act of a movie”
wantmarriage · Reddit ↗
“it had some boring parts”
vga25 · Reddit ↗
“the movie opens with the line "A woman can do anything" followed by a title screen in which they showed a montage of woman all around the world. Damn what is this? A documentary on woman power?”
Prixster · Reddit ↗
Read 28 Aug 2026 · confidence 100% · scored on the same 0-100 scale as a community score · how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience — a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
“An entertaining plot, impressive script, fantastic cast, and awesomely shot action make Charlie's Angels one of the most unexpectedly fun films of the year.”
Rosie Knight, IGN · 81
“Banks brings Charlie’s Angels into the modern age with flair, all while unapologetically raising a feminist flag, championing female friendships and subtly making a point about the urgency of the ongoing climate crisis.”
Beandrea July, The Hollywood Reporter · 80
“What could have been a watery rehash is a fresh, exciting update on an attractive story that previously got lost in its own glamour. Do not underestimate these women.”
Ella Kemp, Empire · 80
“Nobody really asked for another “Charlie’s Angels” reboot, but this one will leave you eager for more. It seems these women might still have the element of surprise on their side, after all.”
David Ehrlich, IndieWire · 75
“It’s got twists without being tawdry. Attitude, with sincerity. And Banks offers a reasonable rebuke to past ickiness, playing up the best elements of an old TV show’s original idea. Charlie’s Angels 2019 flies in the face of its tricky franchise past, and makes for a solid evening’s entertainment.”
Blake Goble, Consequence · 75
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 28 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
“The first fifteen minutes or so are pretty rough in terms of editing”
Smokinacesfan55▲ 348about 0–15% inread it ↗
“it definitely gets better”
Smokinacesfan55▲ 348about 15–100% inread it ↗
“The way the film was edited made me feel nauseous from beginning to end”
Dutchy___▲ 321about 0–100% inread it ↗
“in the third act of a movie”
wantmarriage▲ 272about 75–100% inread it ↗
no tags yet — rate this flick to drop some vibes ✨