pulling the feelsβ¦
pulling the feelsβ¦
FLICKFEEL
54
from 41 comments
COMMUNITY
β
nobody yet
YOURS
β
β¦
FUN
0
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
54
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score β the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 41 comments (36 from Metacritic, 3 from TMDB reviews, 2 from Reddit) β 7 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence β the shape below rests on 7 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
βI've watched the first 50 minutes of this movie 100's of timesβ
king_of_the_nothing Β· Reddit β
βI hear it is very dramaticβ
king_of_the_nothing Β· Reddit β
βI don't like the endβ
Sosmooth1982 Β· Metacritic β
βthe whole time it is in your face screamingβ
emmavtori Β· Metacritic β
βtoo overstimulatingβ
emmavtori Β· Metacritic β
βThis compiles to the most cringe worthy 120 minutes I've had in a long time.β
IronGaming_ Β· Metacritic β
Read 25 Aug 2026 Β· confidence 58% Β· scored on the same 0-100 scale as a community score Β· how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience β a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
βAmid the clamor from outraged purists and Shakespeare spinning in his Stratford-on-Avon, England, grave, you should notice that Luhrmann and his two bright angels have shaken up a 400-year-old play without losing its touching, poetic innocence.β
Peter Travers, Rolling Stone Β· 100
βDiCaprioβs performance is excellent; his Romeo is transformed and astonished by the real thing; he has play-acted at love until now, and he hasnβt realised how vulnerable it would make him. Danes looks more mature than he does (though in fact six years younger) and she is such a smart, stylish player, even at this age. The Luhrmann R+J is a tonic and a delight.β
Peter Bradshaw, The Guardian Β· 100
βIt may be the most visually imaginative Shakespeare film since Akira Kurosawa's "Ran", and certainly one of the more operatic Hollywood creations of recent years.β
Alex Ross, Slate Β· 90
βThis Romeo & Juliet is a rich visual feast, besotted with the fervor of its acrobatic camerawork and kinetic staging and its mind-bending aggregation of unrelated but resonant fragments of 20th-century iconography.β
Marjorie Baumgarten, Austin Chronicle Β· 89
βBaz Luhrmann takes the audience on a unique ride through one of the Bard's best-known texts, illuminating the story, occasionally subjugating the language but always delivering a vision that is bold, brassy, hugely inventive and accessible and, in a strange way, just right.β
Bob McCabe, Empire Β· 80
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 25 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
βI've watched the first 50 minutes of this movie 100's of timesβ
king_of_the_nothingβ² 3about 0β33% inread it β
βI hear it is very dramaticβ
king_of_the_nothingβ² 3about 75β100% inread it β
βI love this film so much. I went to an outdoor screening of it a few years ago with performance artists also playing it out below the screen. I got pulled up to go dance with them during the party scene π β
elvisteethβ² 1read it β
βI don't like the endβ
Sosmooth1982about 75β100% inread it β
βthe whole time it is in your face screamingβ
emmavtoriabout 0β100% inread it β
βtoo overstimulatingβ
emmavtoriabout 0β100% inread it β
βThis compiles to the most cringe worthy 120 minutes I've had in a long time.β
IronGaming_about 0β100% inread it β
βPart 2 of Baz Luhrmann's Red Curtain Trilogy: <em>'Romeo + Juliet'</em>. I remember watching a little bit of this years and years back at high school and I seem to recall enjoying it a lot. I didn't enjoy it as much as I thought I might've on this viewing, but it is still a film I'd recommend for sure - it's very good. I'm yet to see a bad - heck, even a just mildly good - film from Leonardo DiCaprio, which remains the case after this. It's probably the weakest performance I've seen from Dβ
r96skread it β
βShakespeare is still getting work in Hollywood, and probably always will... ... but I like updated modern Shakespeare when it comes in the form of West Side Story, She's all That, Overboard (all the other million or so Rom-Coms based off of The Taming of the Shrew) and not when the film is modern day with Shakespearean English and... yeah. Too much of a Juxtaposition for me. The kind of WWII update of Richard III wasn't bad, but it wasn't really taking Richard II, putting it in a differβ
GenerationofSwineread it β
βBaz Luhrmann has relocated this classic to modern day Verona Beach and introduced a contemporary sound track to complement much of the original dialogue from the bard's story of true love, revenge and, quite possibly, the greatest tragedy ever written in the English language. The families "Montague" and "Capulet" have been feuding since God was a boy. The uneasy truce between them is to be severely tested when "Romeo" (Leonardo DiCaprio) and "Juliet" (Clare Danes) fall in love. Being from each oβ
CinemaSerfread it β
no tags yet β rate this flick to drop some vibes β¨