pulling the feels…
pulling the feels…
FLICKFEEL
59
from 29 comments
COMMUNITY
—
nobody yet
YOURS
—
…
FUN
0
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
27
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score — the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 29 comments (26 from Metacritic, 3 from TMDB reviews) — 9 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence — the shape below rests on 9 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
“that is where the film really slows down to a rather ponderous grind”
CinemaSerf · TMDB reviews ↗
“The story goes will in the first half”
akshatmahajan · Metacritic ↗
“in second half it appeares to be building up some momentum but never delivers”
akshatmahajan · Metacritic ↗
“the movie felt a bit tired and draggy at times”
Iamcritical86 · Metacritic ↗
“the very end scene when I was expecting the Ghost Busters theme to play”
Semtex_Steve · Metacritic ↗
“This is quite a slow movie. Most of the movie nothing happens”
Dancingonfloors · Metacritic ↗
Read 28 Aug 2026 · confidence 54% · scored on the same 0-100 scale as a community score · how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience — a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
“While nothing groundbreaking, the story mines a degree of profundity out of the traditional supernatural thriller tropes at its core.”
Eric Kohn, IndieWire · 83
“It helps that Hilditch has Jane in the central role. Along with Carla Gugino’s turn in Gerald’s Game, Netflix has two of the strongest performances in any King adaptation to date.”
Dan Caffrey, Consequence · 83
“1922 is a ghastly slow burner, not the kind where nothing happens until the last ten minutes, but rather the kind that layers minor incident upon minor incident until they tally up to something major.”
Andrew Crump, The Playlist · 83
“At its best, it’s a reminder that King’s biggest strengths lie in his unparalleled ability to build tension, create atmosphere, and tell a direct and brutal story, not in his ability to launch profitable many-branched franchises.”
Tasha Robinson, The Verge · 77
“Zak Hilditch's 1922 informs Steven King's pulp feminism with primordial, biblically ugly force.”
Chuck Bowen, Slant Magazine · 75
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 28 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
it reviews better than it plays — critics 81, the watch 59
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
“The story goes will in the first half”
akshatmahajanabout 0–50% inread it ↗
“in second half it appeares to be building up some momentum but never delivers”
akshatmahajanabout 50–100% inread it ↗
“the movie felt a bit tired and draggy at times”
Iamcritical86about 0–100% inread it ↗
“the very end scene when I was expecting the Ghost Busters theme to play”
Semtex_Steveabout 85–100% inread it ↗
“that is where the film really slows down to a rather ponderous grind”
CinemaSerfabout 33–66% inread it ↗
“Thomas Jane's accent might be pretty hard to understand, and the story is just a just a plot you've already seen put through the Stephen King's _Children of the Corn_ wringer, but that doesn't stop 1922 from being another Stephen King adaptation we can put in 2017's "Good" column, alongside _It_ and _Gerald's Game_ (and decidedly not alongside _The Dark Tower_). _Final rating:★★★ - I liked it. Would personally recommend you give it a go._”
Gimlyread it ↗
no tags yet — rate this flick to drop some vibes ✨