pulling the feelsβ¦
pulling the feelsβ¦
FLICKFEEL
57
from 50 comments
COMMUNITY
β
nobody yet
YOURS
β
β¦
FUN
16
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
37
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score β the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 50 comments (45 from Metacritic, 5 from TMDB reviews) β 15 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence β the shape below rests on 15 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
βSo far it's all a bit benignβ
CinemaSerf Β· TMDB reviews β
βthere's also another death scene that's particularly graphic and might put people off this film halfway throughβ
ALMJ Β· Metacritic β
βWhy did they kill off the main protagonist halfway through and bring in new characters?β
Nightscape_ Β· Metacritic β
βHe can come back alive at the very end of the movie without any explanation?β
Nightscape_ Β· Metacritic β
βFew murders, but unusual and partly boring.β
AlexMed09 Β· Metacritic β
βespecially the ending.β
thearia Β· Metacritic β
Read 28 Aug 2026 Β· confidence 100% Β· scored on the same 0-100 scale as a community score Β· how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience β a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 28 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
βthere's also another death scene that's particularly graphic and might put people off this film halfway throughβ
ALMJabout 50β60% inread it β
βWhy did they kill off the main protagonist halfway through and bring in new characters?β
Nightscape_about 33β66% inread it β
βHe can come back alive at the very end of the movie without any explanation?β
Nightscape_about 85β100% inread it β
βFew murders, but unusual and partly boring.β
AlexMed09about 0β100% inread it β
βSo far it's all a bit benignβ
CinemaSerfabout 0β15% inread it β
βTerrifier is a gory movie with a sadistic killer clown that revels in mutilating his victims in creative ways and willing to use any kind of improvised weapon as well as one not often seen in slasher movies. The movie makes effective use of practical effects and the gory murders are graphic enough to make you know this movie means business. David Howard Thornton stars as Art the Clown and his portrayal is devilishly effective as a villain who is mute and must use facial gestures to express himseβ
Carlos G Diazread it β
β_Terrifier_ had a lot of hype behind it with its very successful sequel hitting theaters this month, and unfortunately it did not translate to a pleasurable viewing experience. Before I jump into my criticisms of the film, the on-screen quality of visuals and effects were top notch for a budget of a mere $25,000. It is amazing what this crew was able to do with their conditions and everyone involved should be proud. With that being said, the limited budget does not give excuses for a poor scriptβ
Nathanread it β
β<em>'Terrifier'</em> is a mixed bag. The gory stuff is done to a decent degree, even if those moments are a bit too few and far between. Art the Clown certainly looks and acts the part, even if I wanted more from the character - giving him a voice would've made him more creepy in my opinion, rather than complete silence. This 2016 flick was made on a tiny budget, something that is very evident throughout, but given that you do have to hold appreciation for the filmmakers. I will say, thougβ
no tags yet β rate this flick to drop some vibes β¨
r96skread it β