pulling the feelsβ¦
pulling the feelsβ¦
FLICKFEEL
β
from 7 comments
COMMUNITY
β
nobody yet
YOURS
β
β¦
FUN
0
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
0
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score β the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 7 comments (7 from TMDB reviews) β 1 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence β the shape below rests on 1 comment. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
βTim Burton's flamboyance lets things down in the endβ
Rob Β· TMDB reviews β
Read 25 Aug 2026 Β· confidence 0% Β· too thin for a score Β· how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience β a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 24 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
βTim Burton's flamboyance lets things down in the endβ
Robabout 75β100% inread it β
βVision not fully realised, but still a template of sorts. It could never have lived up to the hype back in 1989, it was hailed as the film to rival the impact of "Jaws" & "Star Wars" as regards historical cinema conventions, it was, we were led to believe, a new age in cinema, or so it seemed. As it was, the film went down a treat for the modern cinema going audience, it raked in cash galore and spawned a raft of very inferior sequels, even though ultimately critics of the time were less thanβ
John Chardread it β
β_**Looks good, but surreal and tedious**_ Tim Burton's "Batman" (1989) is _so_ disappointing! Yeah, the costumes, sets, cast, cinematography and music are great, but the story is unrealistic, goofy and, worst of all, dull; in other words, it siphoned! Tim Burton is outstanding with visuals, but he failed to incorporate an interesting story. What good is a BORING film that looks great and doesn't take its subject seriously? This is a quintessential example of style over substance. Most of tβ
Wuchakread it β
β**Batman 1989 burst on the scene shattering the box office and rewriting the rules of comic book films with dark characters and high stakes in ways no superhero movie had seen before.** Superhero movies of the 70s and 80s were bright and colorful, goofy and optimistic, champions of truth, Justice, and the American Way. Movies like Superman, Supergirl, the original Captain America, and even Adam Westβs Batman all fit this vibe and aesthetic, with many overly campy but charming. This made Tim Bβ
The Movie Mobread it β
no tags yet β rate this flick to drop some vibes β¨