pulling the feels…
pulling the feels…
FLICKFEEL
40
from 52 comments
COMMUNITY
—
nobody yet
YOURS
—
…
FUN
0
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
47
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score — the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 52 comments (49 from Metacritic, 3 from TMDB reviews) — 19 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence — the shape below rests on 19 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
“While the film starts off well”
tmdb31220774 · TMDB reviews ↗
“the second half of the movie has way to many plot-holes leaving the viewers with too many questions”
tmdb31220774 · TMDB reviews ↗
“Filme lento!”
Nazario08 · Metacritic ↗
“It takes a while to actually get going in my opinion”
KleverViper · Metacritic ↗
“but when it does it is quite good”
KleverViper · Metacritic ↗
“in the end I didn't come away satisfied”
KleverViper · Metacritic ↗
Read 28 Aug 2026 · confidence 100% · scored on the same 0-100 scale as a community score · how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience — a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
“All of the young actors are committed, and director Dean Israelite has a good handle on the material, offering his own contributions to the time travel genre (like how violent the act itself is) while continually tipping his hat to what came before it.”
Drew Taylor, The Playlist · 75
“On the whole, this is a good B-movie that hits it modest marks.”
David Edelstein, New York Magazine (Vulture) · 70
“Despite the film’s largely hectic point-of-view, first-time helmer Dean Israelite credibly establishes a science-positive environment that ultimately results in less-than-intelligent displays of teenage impulsiveness, and the kids have a believably determined camaraderie as they only ever use the device together to get revenge on bullies, win the lottery, and snag backstage passes at Lollapalooza.”
William Goss, Austin Chronicle · 67
“Clever, funny but emotionally stunted. Like most teenagers.”
Roger Moore, Movie Nation · 63
“One of the advantages of time travel in a found-footage film is that it makes the chronology and causality so confusing that the problem of who’s shooting what becomes secondary. On the other hand, it doesn’t allow fast-forwarding through all the boring bits. For starters, I could have done with far less Lollapalooza.”
Peter Keough, Boston Globe · 63
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 28 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
“While the film starts off well”
tmdb31220774about 0–50% inread it ↗
“the second half of the movie has way to many plot-holes leaving the viewers with too many questions”
tmdb31220774about 50–100% inread it ↗
“Look…one can never have enough time travel movies for our escapist needs, correct? After all, the possibilities are endless in terms of how filmmakers could explore the surreal dynamics of different dimensions thus allowing audiences to suspend their disbelief and engage in the wonderment of SF exuberance. So the question remains: can first-time director Dan Israelite instill some fresh distinction into the ubiquitous genre with the teen-oriented time travel vehicle ‘Project Almanac’? Well, let’”
Frank Ochiengread it ↗
no tags yet — rate this flick to drop some vibes ✨