pulling the feels…
pulling the feels…
FLICKFEEL
—
from 18 comments
COMMUNITY
—
nobody yet
YOURS
—
…
FUN
0
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
0
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score — the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 18 comments (16 from Metacritic, 2 from TMDB reviews) — 2 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence — the shape below rests on 2 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
“the conclusion declares that "surrogates" are bad, and therefore the only really interesting part of the film should not exist”
HotelCentral · Metacritic ↗
“they even tried to lampshade the ending with the whole **** "and the surrogate services will be shut down for who knows how long" line. Come on, give me a break. Most people will just treat it like another "oops I seem to have crashed my surrogate in a ditch, better get a new one!" incident. Nothing changes, movie POINTLESS.”
XolPemNab · Metacritic ↗
Read 28 Aug 2026 · confidence 3% · too thin for a score · how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience — a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
“What follows is pulp made near-profound through director Jonathan Mostow’s sure-handed guidance.”
Keith Uhlich, Time Out · 80
“There's fun robot stuff, some good philosophical ideas, and a brief, nutty Willis-Ving Rhames reunion 15 years after "Pulp Fiction."”
Lisa Schwarzbaum, Entertainment Weekly · 75
“Among cheesy sci-fi movies meant to make you think, I'll take Surrogates over "District 9." Both are highly derivative, but in the course of recombining the basic chromosomes of "Blade Runner," "The Matrix" and especially "I, Robot," Surrogates nudges the robo-thriller in an interesting direction.”
Kyle Smith, New York Post · 75
“This represesents the smartest high-budget, high-profile science fiction film to have come along in quite some time.”
James Berardinelli, ReelViews · 75
“Mostow's smart speculative suspenser imagines a time when people can live through ideal versions of themselves while they sit wired up at home.”
Todd McCarthy, Variety · 70
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 28 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
“the conclusion declares that "surrogates" are bad, and therefore the only really interesting part of the film should not exist”
HotelCentralabout 75–100% inread it ↗
“they even tried to lampshade the ending with the whole **** "and the surrogate services will be shut down for who knows how long" line. Come on, give me a break. Most people will just treat it like another "oops I seem to have crashed my surrogate in a ditch, better get a new one!" incident. Nothing changes, movie POINTLESS.”
XolPemNababout 75–100% inread it ↗
“Great and interesting subject. With the first a.i. bots now coming to "life" these surrogates are just a little 0,001% closer than they were only a few years ago. Acting of Burce Willis is class. The storyline is a bit too much to handle in terms of movie-duration, but definately a good movie.”
JCVDread it ↗
“Surrogates (2009) takes an interesting concept, people living through robotic avatars, and turns it into a straightforward action thriller. The plot is easy to follow, with a few twists along the way, but it never really digs deep into the bigger questions it could have explored. The movie has a polished look, and the visual effects for the surrogates are decent for the time, making them feel just artificial enough. The directing keeps the pacing tight, but the script doesn't do much beyond movi”
ralphrahalread it ↗
“Surrogacy is a perversion. It's an addiction. And you have to kill the addict to kill the addiction. I first viewed Surrogates upon its home format release and positively found it very ordinary. Viewing it again, with focus and in solitude, it proved to be a far better experience. The action scenes are what you would expect for a multi-plex appeasing popcorner, loud, colourful and owing great debt to modern technology. Yet to dismiss this totally as one of those easy money making blockbus”
John Chardread it ↗
“Surrogates (2009) takes an interesting concept, people living through robotic avatars, and turns it into a straightforward action thriller. The plot is easy to follow, with a few twists along the way, but it never really digs deep into the bigger questions it could have explored. The movie has a polished look, and the visual effects for the surrogates are decent for the time, making them feel just artificial enough. The directing keeps the pacing tight, but the script doesn't do much beyond movi”
RalphRahalread it ↗
no tags yet — rate this flick to drop some vibes ✨