pulling the feelsβ¦
pulling the feelsβ¦
FLICKFEEL
66
from 54 comments
COMMUNITY
β
nobody yet
YOURS
β
β¦
FUN
15
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
36
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score β the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 54 comments (26 from Metacritic, 24 from Reddit, 4 from TMDB reviews) β 12 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence β the shape below rests on 12 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
βpart two is ultimately a sort of interim plot filler for the finale to come a year laterβ
John Chard Β· TMDB reviews β
βpart two is at first a puzzle box of a picture, one that had this particular viewer back in the day venturing in for multiple viewings to unravel tβ
John Chard Β· TMDB reviews β
βit becomes a little over-saturated with so many plot-lines and so many different situations that our characters get intoβ
MrMovieBuff Β· Metacritic β
βWhat screen time the cast doesn't spend breathlessly explaining the plot (which is, perhaps, fifty percent of the duration)β
drqshadow Β· Metacritic β
βit didn't slow down and there was always something going on, which I believe will suit a lot of people, because there is always something going on. The constant adrenaline rush which was really coolβ
MrPajamas Β· Metacritic β
βI think the first one had a better ending, because here we are clearly told that we are going to have a threesome, while the first one ended and although the second one was good, I think it could have ended quite well. Here we are immediately excited for the threequel and so I didn't quite get a sense of an ending or aβ
MrPajamas Β· Metacritic β
Read 24 Aug 2026 Β· confidence 100% Β· scored on the same 0-100 scale as a community score Β· how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience β a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
βIt twists it, shakes it and stands it on its ear. But as before, the film's technical brilliance is the least of its appeals. Satirically acute, intricately structured and deftly paced, it is at heart stout, good and untainted by easy sentiment.β
Richard Schickel, Time Β· 90
βAll in all, Future II is another fantastic voyage in a thoroughly entertaining contraption.β
Ira Robbins , Entertainment Weekly Β· 83
βBack to the Future deserved a chance to come back, especially under the cheerful, enterprising, mathematically minded stewardship of Mr. Zemeckis and Mr. Gale. Their new film isn't an ordinary sequel. It's as if the earlier film had been squared.β
Janet Maslin, The New York Times Β· 80
βI should have brought a big yellow legal pad to the screening, so I could take detailed notes just to keep the time-lines straight. And yet the movie is fun, mostly because it's so screwy.β
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times Β· 75
βIf "Back to the Future" made you bored and querulous, then the tumbling inventiveness in its sequel may come as a pleasant surprise. Of course, if you were among the 92% of the world who loved the ride in Dr. Emmett Brown's diabolical DeLorean back in 1985, then Part II is your oyster. [22 Nov 1989, p.F1]β
Sheila Benson, Los Angeles Times Β· 70
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 24 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
βit becomes a little over-saturated with so many plot-lines and so many different situations that our characters get intoβ
MrMovieBuffabout 0β100% inread it β
βWhat screen time the cast doesn't spend breathlessly explaining the plot (which is, perhaps, fifty percent of the duration)β
drqshadowabout 0β50% inread it β
βit didn't slow down and there was always something going on, which I believe will suit a lot of people, because there is always something going on. The constant adrenaline rush which was really coolβ
MrPajamasabout 0β100% inread it β
βI think the first one had a better ending, because here we are clearly told that we are going to have a threesome, while the first one ended and although the second one was good, I think it could have ended quite well. Here we are immediately excited for the threequel and so I didn't quite get a sense of an ending or aβ
MrPajamasabout 75β100% inread it β
βpart two is ultimately a sort of interim plot filler for the finale to come a year laterβ
John Chardabout 66β100% inread it β
βpart two is at first a puzzle box of a picture, one that had this particular viewer back in the day venturing in for multiple viewings to unravel tβ
John Chardabout 0β33% inread it β
βfeels disjointed at times going back and forth in time from 1985 to 2015 to alternate 1985 and back to 1955β
JPV852about 0β100% inread it β
β"Back to the Future Part II" is a refreshing and inexhaustible source of entertainment and inventive fun for everyone. It features an abundance of memorable action sequences which have been brought to the screen with innovation and skill and great visual imagination. It also draws upon events featured in the original film to create an entirely different slant on the same sequences, but this time around the motivating factors in doing this retread are entirely different. Of course such sequences β
kevin2019read it β
no tags yet β rate this flick to drop some vibes β¨