pulling the feels…
pulling the feels…
FLICKFEEL
37
from 51 comments
COMMUNITY
—
nobody yet
YOURS
—
…
FUN
0
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
28
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score — the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 51 comments (50 from Metacritic, 1 from TMDB reviews) — 19 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence — the shape below rests on 19 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
“ends up boring in large parts, without ever giving a change of pace to the story”
BM7 · Metacritic ↗
“Such an immediately boring and flat film”
OffworldColony · Metacritic ↗
“The crew assembly montage was one of the corniest scenes in cinema history and it just kept going.”
LeftLibertine · Metacritic ↗
“the film is long”
amheretojudge · Metacritic ↗
“the start wasn't good, at all. I was bored”
MonkiReviews · Metacritic ↗
“souvent chiant”
Broyax · Metacritic ↗
Read 28 Aug 2026 · confidence 100% · scored on the same 0-100 scale as a community score · how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience — a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
It reviews better than it plays — admired more than it is enjoyed.
“This is their story. It is true. It is history. As a film, it is riveting, suspenseful, harrowing and exciting, and somehow, it also manages to be something rare among war pictures—a big-scale entertainment.”
Rex Reed, Observer · 88
“Who knew? The work of the Monuments Men is fresh territory for film, and Clooney builds the story with intriguing detail and scope.”
Peter Travers, Rolling Stone · 75
“This is a solid albeit slow-building film with few dull moments.”
Richard Roeper, Chicago Sun-Times · 75
“If you’re worried that the re-teaming of Clooney and Cate Blanchett in a World War II movie signals something like “The Good German,” fear not: She’s better here, playing a French art historian who worries the Americans will “rescue” the art in order to steal it for their own country.”
Lawrence Toppman, Charlotte Observer · 75
“Except possibly for a superlative supporting performance by Hugh Bonneville of “Downton Abbey,’’ Clooney’s low-key directorial effort is not quite an Oscar-caliber movie, though it’s got a great cast, a worthy theme and plenty of things to reward adult moviegoers.”
Lou Lumenick, New York Post · 75
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 28 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
“ends up boring in large parts, without ever giving a change of pace to the story”
BM7about 0–100% inread it ↗
“Such an immediately boring and flat film”
OffworldColonyabout 0–100% inread it ↗
“The crew assembly montage was one of the corniest scenes in cinema history and it just kept going.”
LeftLibertineabout 10–20% inread it ↗
“the film is long”
amheretojudgeabout 0–100% inread it ↗
“George Clooney starred, co-wrote and directed this interesting wartime drama. It centres around an elite squad sent to try to rescue precious works of art from the retreating Nazi war machine. Not elite in an SAS or SEAL type military sense, but dedicated to identifying and preserving these artefacts that could be anything from a small painting to a life-sized statue. Historically and logistically it is all over the place, but it has a feel-good sentiment to it for the most part. It focusses on ”
CinemaSerfread it ↗
no tags yet — rate this flick to drop some vibes ✨