pulling the feelsβ¦
pulling the feelsβ¦
FLICKFEEL
β
from 18 comments
COMMUNITY
β
nobody yet
YOURS
β
β¦
FUN
19
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
33
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score β the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 18 comments (16 from Metacritic, 2 from TMDB reviews) β 6 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence β the shape below rests on 6 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
βOnce the pic kicks into being a revenge killer thriller, it lackβ
John Chard Β· TMDB reviews β
βI was captivated by its "raw" and "vivid" exploration of revenge and lost innocence.β
famfacat Β· Metacritic β
βWatching the "vivid" transformation from a traumatized youth to a "sensational" predator provided an emotional payoffβ
famfacat Β· Metacritic β
βthe 20 minutes of the WWII prologue is imperative on the motivation of the protagonistβ
TheArchetypes Β· Metacritic β
βThe movie is long and even boring at bitsβ
Meth-dude Β· Metacritic β
βthe final act and the interesting story kind of redeem these defaultsβ
Meth-dude Β· Metacritic β
Read 28 Aug 2026 Β· confidence 15% Β· too thin for a score Β· how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience β a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
βHannibal Rising isn't a classic, but it's entertaining and a surprisingly fitting addition to the franchise.β
Peter Hartlaub, San Francisco Chronicle Β· 75
βThe story's beginning is in a rush to get to the the killings, which get more and more disgusting.β
Jenni Miller, Premiere Β· 63
βThis strikes me as the final nail in the franchise's coffin. I can't name an actor who could have made young Lecter as interesting as the older one, but Ulliel does not come close.β
Jack Mathews, New York Daily News Β· 63
βIt's a handsomely mounted but poky thriller undone by a fatally miscast lead.β
Ken Fox, TV Guide Magazine Β· 63
βThis is essentially a by-the-numbers revenge film with some attempts at deeper characterization. The difference between this film and, say, "Batman Begins" is that Bruce Wayne, upon finding the tormentors of his youth, never tried to kill and eat them.β
Mark Bell, Film Threat Β· 60
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 28 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
βI was captivated by its "raw" and "vivid" exploration of revenge and lost innocence.β
famfacatabout 0β100% inread it β
βWatching the "vivid" transformation from a traumatized youth to a "sensational" predator provided an emotional payoffβ
famfacatabout 0β100% inread it β
βthe 20 minutes of the WWII prologue is imperative on the motivation of the protagonistβ
TheArchetypesabout 0β15% inread it β
βThe movie is long and even boring at bitsβ
Meth-dudeabout 0β100% inread it β
βOnce the pic kicks into being a revenge killer thriller, it lackβ
John Chardabout 50β100% inread it β
βIβve always equated Hannibal Lecter with the Shark from Jaws. Sure, the good doctor is a more entertaining host β until he gets peckish β but they both essentially kill to feed. Thatβs all the motivation they require. How silly would it be to give a shark a tragic origin story? About as silly as setting a film in Lithuania and France with French and Lithuanian characters and then having everybody speak English. Or assigning Hannibal (Gaspard Ulliel) a Japanese mentoress (played by a Chinese aβ
JPRetanaread it β
no tags yet β rate this flick to drop some vibes β¨