pulling the feels…
pulling the feels…
FLICKFEEL
—
from 13 comments
COMMUNITY
—
nobody yet
YOURS
—
…
FUN
0
how good a time it was
MEANINGFUL
0
how much it moved you
Two separate readings, not parts of the score — the score says how much of it held you, these say what kind of watch it was.
Nobody has rated this on FlickFeel yet. This is public discussion of this title, read into a curve. It is not a rating and it never becomes one.
Read from 13 comments (12 from Metacritic, 1 from TMDB reviews) — 3 of them described how it moves.
Thin evidence — the shape below rests on 3 comments. The shaded band is how wide the uncertainty actually is, and it is drawn to scale.
Not enough people said when to name this shape. The line is what the evidence draws, not a finding.
Hover the curveDrag across the curve to see what people said at any point.
“Watched first episodes and historical identity is about zero. Cant watch it for serious.”
antonio_riviera · Metacritic ↗
“un long et pÃnible mÃlodramatique historique à suivre avec ennui”
avatar16 · Metacritic ↗
“The first half of the movie tries to cover way to much ground in to little time.”
moviegrabbag · Metacritic ↗
Read 28 Aug 2026 · confidence 4% · too thin for a score · how this works
Published reviews, not felt experience — a different question from the one above, and never mixed into the FlickFeel score.
“An absorbing, exciting costume drama that works as a historical romance, a family tragedy and a showcase for its young stars.”
William Arnold, Seattle Post-Intelligencer · 83
“A classy romantic cocktail distinguished by its tart yet breezy bite.”
Owen Gleiberman, Entertainment Weekly · 75
“The result is an entertainingly sudsy trip through early 16th century English history.”
James Berardinelli, ReelViews · 75
“An enjoyable movie with an entertaining angle on a hard-to-resist period of history.”
Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle · 75
“A richly appointed period piece, it features kingly tantrums, mistresses, bodices, roaring fireplaces, incest, and mutton. It also features sharply enunciated, period-perfect dialogue in which nary a contraction can be heard.”
Peter Rainer, Christian Science Monitor · 75
Scores from Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes, read 28 Aug 2026. Quotes belong to their publications and link to the full reviews.
Grouped by where it was written, because a considered review and a reaction typed an hour after the credits are different things. Every quote links to its source.
“Watched first episodes and historical identity is about zero. Cant watch it for serious.”
antonio_rivieraabout 0–33% inread it ↗
“un long et pÃnible mÃlodramatique historique à suivre avec ennui”
avatar16about 0–100% inread it ↗
“The first half of the movie tries to cover way to much ground in to little time.”
moviegrabbagabout 0–50% inread it ↗
“The subject of the film and Henry VIII's marriage has been the subject of many films and series. This movie is smooth in telling the story and it does it well. Natalie Portman's performance in the role of "Anne" is remarkable. The film is a narrative of human inner being, how aggression and power-seeking can affect them. In other words, it shows the destruction of man and humanity at the center of power seeking. In general, the movie is acceptable and it is enjoyable to watch and you can easily ”
hamidgoodarziread it ↗
“Except, it isn't really much about the "other" Boleyn girl at all, is it? Eric Bana never could hold a film together, and his effort as the amorous but volatile King Henry VIII proves he can't here either. Scarlett Johansson (Anne) and Natalie Portman (Mary) play the Boleyn girls well enough with decent, if brief, contributions from Kristin Scott-Thomas and Mark Rylance as their parents and from Jim Sturgess as their sexually ambiguous brother George. It looks sumptuous enough with plenty of att”
CinemaSerfread it ↗
no tags yet — rate this flick to drop some vibes ✨